🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations worked, and shared recent overtures had been made by mediators to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is walking a challenging course since Iran wishes not to be seen to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries employed their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in certain ways if talks resume.

The American leader last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be settled by military means. He said the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and continues the primary answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The Iranian people have become stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the administration and the state in the face of this invasion."